Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3debaeec.2879341@News.xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: 'Current Dumping' Amplifier Circuits ?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 13:35:59 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 13:36:02 GMT
Phil Allison wrote:
> "Kevin Aylward" wrote in message
>> Phil Allison wrote:
>>> "Lukas Louw" wrote in message
>>>> Good idea in theory, but as others have pointed out there are
>>>> easier ways to get from here to here.
>>> ** No-one has "pointed out" any such thing. Just rectum
>>> venting like you .
>> Yes they have, to wit:
>> Kevin Aylward:
>> "In my view, its simply not worth the effort. With a trivial 6-8
>> transistor circuit one can easily achieve 0.002% THD."
> ** That is a very fine example of "rectum venting".
Unfortunately for you, my claim is indeed still correct.
> It was your good self I had in mind when I typed the words.
> Now, if you have some erudite case to put then I and others
> would be amused to see it.
As I would be to see you actually put forward a technical argument in
support of your views, no matter how elementary.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.