The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3debaeec.2879341@News.xtra.co.nz> <6r2H9.1154$8Z4.113174@newsfep2-gui>
Subject: Re: 'Current Dumping' Amplifier Circuits ?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:12:28 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:01:42 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Kevin Aylward" wrote in message
> >>> ** No-one has "pointed out" any such thing. Just rectum
> >>> venting like you .
> >> Yes they have, to wit:
> >> Kevin Aylward:
> >> "In my view, its simply not worth the effort. With a trivial 6-8
> >> transistor circuit one can easily achieve 0.002% THD."
> > ** That is a very fine example of "rectum venting".
> Unfortunately for you, my claim is indeed still correct.
** It does not even make sense.
> > It was your good self I had in mind when I typed the words.
> > Now, if you have some erudite case to put then I and others
> > would be amused to see it.
> As I would be to see you actually put forward a technical argument in
> support of your views, no matter how elementary.
** No, the onus in on you to put your case. So far you have used
only unsupported assertions and poot.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup