The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DEB8034.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DECCCDF.email@example.com> <3DED7F7E.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Triac controlled holiday lights
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:16:37 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:05:38 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Fred Bloggs" wrote in message
> Phil Allison wrote:
> > "Fred Bloggs" wrote in message
> > news:3DECCCDF.email@example.com...
> >>Right- but those were for bulbs rated for 120VAC. The half-wave
> >>rectification cuts the RMS down to 70% of that or 84VAC. In your case,
> >>you would have 84VAC across a string rated for 60VAC, and this will be
> >>bad news. My dimensions were off in the original post, but if the bulbs
> >>are rated at 700 hours on 60VAC, then 84VAC will reduce their lifetime
> >>to 12 hours.
> > ** No, much less than that with a 40% overvoltage.
> > The 2 to the power of 12 rule is only valid for small voltage
> > deviations.
> > You must have missed that one at Uni Fred.
> It is not a 2^12 rule, it is the (voltage ratio)^12 rule, and in this
> instance it is good for concluding with great confidence that 84Vrms is
> way out of bounds.
** Then you should have posted *that* and not the erroneous figure you
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup