The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Reply-To: "fred bartoli"
From: "fred bartoli"
References: <3DE82E1C.C41BE9CE@SpamMeSenseless.us.ibm.com> <3DEE0814.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Ebers-Moll equation
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 15:35:40 +0100
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date: 04 Dec 2002 15:32:39 MET
Kevin Aylward a écrit dans le message :
> Fred Bloggs wrote:
> > Paul Burridge wrote:
> >> On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 12:02:06 -0500, "Peter O. Brackett"
> >> opined thusly:
> >>> Anyone who espouses to know how BJT's operate had better commit
> >>> Ebers-Moll to memory, and
> >>> be able to run it through it's paces with real numbers mentally.
> >>> There are only a very few parameters
> >>> and relationships to memorize
> >> True, but why is the key emphasis placed on defining just saturation
> >> current? I'd have thought the relationship between Vbe and Ic would
> >> be far more useful?
> >> --
> > By "saturation current" he means reverse biased PN-junction reverse
> > saturation current, he does not mean Ice saturation current with both
> > junctions forward biased.
> And it gets more confusing when operating mosfets in their saturation
> region. Reminds me, it is raining outside...
Here too. That's funny how the world is small :-)
> Kevin Aylward
> SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
> Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
> Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup