From: Watson 'Atto Parsec' Name
Subject: Re: audio line specifications
References: <3DEE2757.EE79B063@crf.canon.fr> <3DEE35F9.20AC0D73@gv.net> <3DEE9C16.BAB6D5F6@gv.net>
X-Newsreader: MicroPlanet Gravity v2.60
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 04:37:19 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 05:38:37 PST
Organization: InReach Internet
In article <3DEE9C16.BAB6D5F6@gv.net>, email@example.com talked about...
> John Woodgate wrote:
> >I read in sci.electronics.design that Michael R. Kesti
> >wrote (in <3DEE35F9.20AC0D73@gv.net>) about 'audio line
> >specifications', on Wed, 4 Dec 2002:
> >>There are no such standards for audio. Instead, most equipment, both
> >>consumer and professional, is designed to a rather loose set of conventions.
> >>For consumer equipment these include:
> >Absolutely NOT! Before IEC 61938 was IEC 60268-15, which was around for
> >about 20 years.
> Oh yes, those widely acknowledged, readily available, and universally
> applied IEC standards. They certainly have made plug-and-play of the
> analog audio world!
> >Just because YOU don't know about it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
> I think that you may have missed the "Neener, neener", unless you stuck
> your tounge out when writing that.
Well, if you claim to be authoritative and tell everyone that no such
standards exist, then you can expect to have your nose rubbed in it when
someone tell you that you made a mistake.
Instead of saying no such standards, you might have said that the industry
does so and so, no matter what the standards might be.
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you put NOSPAM in the
Subject: line. alondra101 hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html