The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: Amplifying stage with negative Vgain??
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 17:39:21 +0000
Organization: JMWA Electronics Consultancy
Reply-To: John Woodgate
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:43:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <5Z8C9wtxbnpWyFnyfFzqmVF739>
I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs
wrote (in <3DEF7AA3.email@example.com>) about 'Amplifying stage with
negative Vgain??', on Thu, 5 Dec 2002:
>If the BC337 pinout is such that you have connected E to the input
>junction of the 3k's, B to 12V, and C to the 1080 output resistor, then
>you end up with a configuration that gets 2Vp-p across that 1080 for
>8Vp-p at the input. You have almost certainly done something like this.
>You can figure this out if you measure the quiescent DC voltages at the
> three nodes- what are they?
A sort of nommoc-esab stage! I suspect there are at least two sorts of
BC337 about (as with other TO-92s of that vintage). It should be e-b-c,
but some may be e-c-b and some may be e-c-b but with the leads pre-
formed to e-b-c on a TO-5 circle. Getting one of those that has had the
leads straightened can be just a bit confusing!
My book says there was also a Ferranti (Zetex) BC337P which was c-b-e!
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup