The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <email@example.com> <3DEACF7A.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DEAD5EE.email@example.com> <3DEB8301.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DECC93C.email@example.com> <2i8H9.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Triac controlled holiday lights
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 21:49:26 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 21:38:13 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Keith R. Williams" wrote in message
> In article ,
> email@example.com says...
> > "Keith R. Williams" wrote in message
> > news:MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org...
> > Phil wrote to Fred.
> > >> > > >
> > > > > > ** So *you* have a degree ? In what prey tell ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Pure and Applied Bullshit??
> > > > >
> > > > > Would you two *please* get a room?! Yikes! You fight more than
> > > > > two old maids over Laurence Welk.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ** Posts like this one are always from smug smartarses who are
> > > > lazy to figure out who is the aggressor and who the defender.
> > >
> > > Wrong.
> > ** No right. You cannot pass judgement without knowing.
> I know you're both worthless as long as you have a higher self-
> esteem than intelligence.
** You know nothing of the sort - you are just a smug jerk.
> > >In this case an engineer who would like to learn
> > > something other than cat-fighting skills. Apparently you two
> > > know all about cat-fights and little else.
> > ** Smug and smartarse.
> No, just an honest assessment.
** That is even more smug and smartarse - go look the words up.
> > > You certainly don't know how to post.
> > ** Way better than you do.
> Now *there's* a retort by an adolescent (at best). Perhaps you
> should grow up some?
** An idiot remark deserves no better - OK ?
> > > What's with the silly tabs and asterisks?
> > ** Looks real easy to read on my screen ( OE) - what is wrong with
> > yours ??
> You insist on being different.
** You are insisting on passing pompous judgemnents - who made you into
judge, jury and executioner ?? Or did you just appoint yourself ?
Paragraph indents went the way of
> the buggy whips, and about the same time. The asterisks are
> simply a foolish attempt to be "different". They detract from
> your message.
** They make it easy to read and flag my posts from others in convoluted
> > You are really hard to read, not that there is much there.
> > ** No, there is lots there - just hard for dopes to comprehend.
> See, most people try to make their message easy to comprehend.
** I usually do, but the meaning is intended for the recipient.
BTW Those like, yourself, who but into other's disputes really *are*
on an massive ego trip.
I note that you're incapable of even carrying through the quotation
** I note that you are a colossal PIA.
> Perhaps if you're try to communicate, rather than impress, people
> could learn something. As you are, you're nothing but an
> obstinate boor.
** You are posting nothing but arrogant abuse and arrant nonsense - how
is that supposed to help any situation ? It can only possibly inflame it.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup