The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <3DEE2757.EE79B063@crf.canon.fr> <3DEFD744.3A2D8C8D@gv.net> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: audio line specifications
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 11:47:38 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 11:36:39 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Vlad" wrote in message
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:36:18 +0000, John Woodgate
> >I read in sci.electronics.design that Phil Allison
> >wrote (in ) about 'audio
> >line specifications', on Fri, 6 Dec 2002:
> >>If you need a ( twisted pair)
> >>balanced audio line to have a flat response over distances of 100 metres
> >>more then correct termination of the line is important.
> >What impedance is a 'correct termination' of such a line at audio
> Please Phill answer this question.
> At list you are tell us that is not important if the line is less then
> 100 meters .
> If that was that important you could become a millionaire in a short
> period of time, producing and selling complex terminating networks
> for the many thousands of installed cables.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup