From: Fred Bloggs
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Subject: Re: Amplifying stage with *negative* Voltage gain??
References: <email@example.com> <3DEF1DC0.5EDD@Spam.Bots> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DEF5BEA.2614@Spam.Bots> <3DF0A422.46EE@Spam.Bots> <email@example.com> <3DF2AD8F.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 16:10:42 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 08:10:42 PST
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
John Woodgate wrote:
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs
> wrote (in <3DF2AD8F.email@example.com>) about 'Amplifying stage with
> *negative* Voltage gain??', on Sun, 8 Dec 2002:
>>John Woodgate wrote:
>>>What is very difficult to understand is that, AIUI, you measure 8 V
>>>input with the probe on X1 setting but only 2.2 V out. If the probe has
>>>100 pF capacitance, that suggests that your output coupling capacitor is
>>>about 30 pF.
>>>But then you measure 8 V in with the probe on X1 but 2.2 V with it on
>>>X10. That seems utterly inexplicable.
>>This is not so inexplicable when you consider the GND clip inductance
>>and 100p, or more, of probe and scope capacitance on X1 to make a nice
>>resonate ckt at 3.57MHz with a function generator requiring termination.
> To resonate with 100 pF at 3.57 MHz, the ground lead inductance has to
> be 20 uH. That's an AWFUL long ground lead.
I realized that, it would have to be something with the function
generator behavior interacting with the probe being much more of a
parasitic effect on X1.