The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Spehro Pefhany
Subject: Re: OT Standard Panel Sizes?
References: <email@example.com> <3DF18783.38471AB0@mfi.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 20:25:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:25:02 EST
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 19:28:58 +0000 (UTC), the renowned
firstname.lastname@example.org (Ken Smith) wrote:
>Standards always seem to out live what they relate to. There is a long
>and perhaps true story that ends with the punch line about the distance
>between the rails on a train being based on the width to two horses rear
It goes even further.. the diameter of the Space shuttle's SR booster
rocket is supposedly related to the width of the width of two Roman
horses' rear ends, through ruts in the road and the necessity of
transporting that part of the vehicle by rail from Thiokol in Utah
(IIRC, the middle part comes via barge). North American railway gauge
is 4 ft 8-1/2".
That neat story might lead you to think that worldwide gauges are all
standardized, but of course the wonderful about standards is how many
For example, the trans-Manchurian has to have the wheels swapped
around Ulan Batuur in North-Western China to go from "standard"
gauge (China and Europe) to Russian gauge.
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
email@example.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.co
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup