The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Bob Wilson)
Subject: Re: LM317 or 7808 is better performance for 9V output ?
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 03:34:24 -0000
Organization: Your Organization
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.9 (Released Version) (x86 32bit)
References: <3DEDABCA.906FB592@fanwap.com> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In article <email@example.com>,
>"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
>> "Tong Narak" wrote in message
>> > Hi all,
>> > A. LM317 require 5V head room.
>> > B. 78XX require 2V head room ( Is these correct ? ).
>> > I would like to set the output to 9V. Load ~300mA.
>> > (1) Which one is better proformance and efficiency ?
>> > (2) 7805 and 7808 are same efficiency when adjustable to 9V ?
>> **The LM317 is a superior performer, both in regulation and noise.
>I think you will find that the 78xx has better specs (according to my
>data sheets). I think you may also find that 317's performance would
>degrade even further due to the use of external components if not
>designed correctly. Besides, if you were really concerned with
>regulation and noise at those levels you wouldn't be using a three
>terminal regulator anyway.
Noise especially. 3-terminal regulators will do nothing to clean up noise.
Their internal error amp bandwidth is dead slow; nowhere near fast enough to
clean up noise. It is the caps that are typically added at their output that
can reduce noise. The regulators themselves contribute nothing.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup