The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "PCS Electronics"
Subject: Re: DVD to TV: Need a Schematic Drawing of a DVD RF Modulator. (a.k.a. S-Video & Audio to Coax Converter)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:21:22 +0100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:21:54 MET
Organization: Slovenija OnLine - SiOL
Why doesn't he just look it up in Google.
Something like: RF modulator schematics
Marko - PCS Electronics
Turn your PC into a FM radio station
tel +386 31 318 236
NOTE: It is important that you include the entire contents of this
message in your responses. This will greatly speed up future
"Ken Taylor" wrote in message news:rvhJ9.firstname.lastname@example.org...
> "Ty" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> > "Ken Taylor" wrote in
> > news:AnyI9.firstname.lastname@example.org:
> > >
> > > http://www.epanorama.net/links/videocircuits.html has links to what
> > > you need. Mix and match to suit. The diatribe was unnecessary - I was
> > > tempted to not help, but I was looking at this stuff just recently
> > > anyway. The search terms for this were rpetty basic, so maybe you
> > > should look at your engine's help page. Have fun, the result will be
> > > crap but it's intersting. Get a copy of the ARRL Radio Amateurs'
> > > handbook (or RSGB equivalent). They have lots of stuff about this sort
> > > of thing.
> > >
> > > Ken
> > Well, Ken.
> > Your discouraging words and your suggestion to "mix and match" to end up
> > with a "crappy" circuit were a little entertaining. Since you saw so fit
> > as to read implications into my post I feel compelled to do the same with
> > yours, but I won't.
> > You thought my "diatribe" was unnecessary and maybe it was for you
> > your response sure makes a good case against that argument.
> > The link you posted is of course one I've already looked through and while
> > it does "not" have the correct circuit it does have a half a circuit here
> > and a piece of one there. Its not really what I was interested in but
> > thanks anyway. Your suggestion that I read the ARRL handbook is hateful
> > best. My request is not about building something, and it is certainly not
> > about reading things that might lead a person to eventually creating the
> > schematic on there own. Its about finding the correct schematic already
> > created someplace online and that's it.
> If you'd bothered to just post the request, with minimal crap and not the
> diatribe (it is one - take another look) I would have realised you weren't
> going to build one - I fully appreciate the desire to want to 'just look' at
> a circuit. A nicely designed circuit is a thing of beauty (I really have to
> get out more!). As it was I assumed you wanted to build and use it, and
> warned that the results were going to be crap (which indeed they would be,
> vs, the original video result). There's enough video and RF stuff in the
> handbook that it would be useful if indeed you were building stuff - it
> wasn't 'hateful', I just fell asleep during your original post. I have seen
> the circuit you're after, if I find it again I'll post it. But only coz you
> like circuits - until I re-read your post I thought you were a wanker, but
> now I just think you bite too easily.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup