The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Paul Burridge
Subject: Re: Amplifying stage with *negative* Voltage gain??
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DEF1DC0.5EDD@Spam.Bots> <email@example.com> <3DEF5BEA.2614@Spam.Bots> <3DF0A422.46EE@Spam.Bots> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3DF263CE.3868@Spam.Bots> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 11:29:00 +0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:57:22 GMT
Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:20:07 +0000 (GMT), Tony Williams
> Which is still pointing to more load on the output
> 1nF than you have so far discovered. It could be a
> capacitance, or even something more absurd... any
> chance that the scope is stuck on 50-ohm input-R?
I've just checked on the scope input itself and it says "1M Ohm [in
parallel with] 30pf" earlier someone said it should be nearer 10M.,
but this is *definitely* just 1M (as opposed to the probe itself which
is higher - certainly on X10).
The only other source of capacitance would be two tracks of copper
2.5" long on the stripboard I've used to build this thing. They're
certainly in parallel with the 1n, but since we're only talking of the
low megahertz here, I wouldn't have thought that would be a problem.
"I was going to help him up, but then I thumped him."
Michael Head's plea in mitigation to Weybridge Magistrates, Sept. 1975
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup