The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Steve Andrew"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Which basic compiler to buy?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 04:27:19 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:27:19 EST
Organization: BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.net.au)
Frank Bemelman wrote:
> "Dave_S" schreef in bericht
>> To illustrate a point program the task of writting "hello world" in
>> Qbasic and then write it in C. What is the executable size of each?
>> Qbasic - maybe 10K
>> C - at least 300K Hmmmmm - C was described as a fine edged scapel,
>> why is the wound so big???
> Don't forget the interpreter qbasic.exe that you need also. The C
> program will be large (but smaller than 300K I'd guess) because the
> rather complex code for the printf function will be linked in.
Sounds like the whole of the stdio lib was linked in to me. The actual code
to output a char using something like putch rather than printf would be
minimal. MS were never known for producing granular libraries.
> So, this is really a worthless example. A long time ago I wrote a
> simple 10-channel midi-recorder, in C, executable less than 5K.
> Doesn't prove anything either ;)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup