The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Paul Burridge
Subject: Re: Amplifying stage with *negative* Voltage gain??
References: <3DF263CE.3868@Spam.Bots> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:51:10 +0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:19:31 GMT
Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:22:41 +0000 (GMT), Tony Williams
> Isn't that just the scope probe loading affecting the
> low-impedance output less than the input?
Brilliant! I do hope you're right as I'd really like to lay this thing
to rest. What I will take away from this is the knowledge that you
can't make a measurement without affecting the quantities you're
trying to measure. Until now I'd only assumed it was a marginal effect
that one only had to take into account with (for example) extremely
high impedance sources.
> I'm beginning to suspect Paul that it is all working
> ok..... until poking a (x1) scope probe on the input
> buggerates the oscillator.
I'm strongly tempted to agree with you for the peace of mind aspect
> At this stage you've done so many exhaustive checks
> that you can pretty well believe that the ac signal
> on the emitter is a fairly good 1:1 representation
> of what is being delivered to the base.
Excellent. Let's hope no one comes along with less satisfactory but
more plausible explanation. :-)
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd"
- William Blake, 1793
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup