The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Gibbo)
Date: 17 Dec 2002 04:21:41 GMT
Organization: AOL, http://www.aol.co.uk
Subject: Re: NG etiquette
David Lesher email@example.com wrote:
>briansalt@NScix.co.uk (B. W. Salt.) writes:
>>Why should one have to trawl through all that repeat message(s) just to
>>get to the reply?
>>Remove NS from address before replying.
>>In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
>>email@example.com (Gibbo) wrote:
>1) If the message is quoted CORRECTLY, i.e. that that's necessary and
>sufficient, there ARE NO "repeat" messages" to trawl through. There
>is a summary.
>1A) If the poster did not bother, you should not bother reading his
>2) If you use a newsreader to read news (not a browser or virus petri dish
>like look!Out) TAB will skip the quoted text......
Well you attributed it to me even though I didn't write it but I couldn't agree
with the sentiment more if I tried"
Sort your a postings orders out. Sort your quotes out. Read the newsgroup's
etiquette. Read the google rules. Read the posting rules. They're not even
difficult to understand.
It's not a case of being pedantic or awkward. Or follwowing rules and
regulations. Fact is we're human and European. We read from top left to bottom
right. Anything else is just wrong.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup