The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "R. Lewis"
Subject: Re: Watt Meter Project....Attn Win
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:48:31 -0000
Organization: Nextra UK
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:48:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
"Fred Bloggs" wrote in message
> R. Lewis wrote:
> > "Winfield Hill" wrote in message
> > news:email@example.com...
> >>R. Lewis wrote...
> >>>Winfield Hill wrote
> >>>>Gary Lecomte wrote...
> >>>>>I have just put a good Watt-meter design on my site. It is also
> >>>>>capable of measuring wattage into complex loads! And its quite
> >>>>>simple to make.
> >>>> As an alternate solution, NSC offers the LM13700, which features
> >>>> a pair of linearizing diodes that allows the use of higher signals,
> >>>> such as from a conventional 50 or 100mV current shunt.
> >>>> http://www.national.com/pf/LM/LM13700.html
> >>>How does this meter work? At first sight it just seems to do VA
> >>>rather than watts.
> >> You're referring to the LM394 circuit? First off, it only operates
> >> for half the ac cycle, as it assumes both are the same. That said,
> >> at every instant it multiplies V (proportional to the LM394 current)
> >> and I (proportional to the unbalance of the long-tail pair) together
> >> and then the meter takes averages this. So it's a legitimate vector
> >> power calculation.
> > I appreciate that it just works on the half cycle but doesn't it just
> > compute volts x amps - which is not watts for a reactive load. The
> > notes say it works for a complex load but I don't see how.
> > Am I missing something here.
> You are missing the fact that the average of the instantaneous i x v
> product is real power- the quadrature component in the product averages
> to zero. Volt-Amps is a product of averages (RMS) and not an average of
> a product.
You are correct in that I wrote VA as a lazy mans way of writing sigma di*dv
but what I still cannot see is how the power in a reactive load can be
deduced from looking only at two consecutive quadrants.
No problem as long as the load is not reactive - make the assumption that
the each half wave is the same as the next - but is it not the point with
complex loads that this is not so - and cannot be so else they would not be
At a glance, since the claim for the circuit is that it is valid for complex
(reactive) loads, I wondered if there was something clever going on that
somehow predicted the non-monitored quadrants behaviour.
On further inspection I see that it doesn't and the claim is invalid.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup