The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Rod Speed"
Subject: Re: Papers [How did we get here from 100R ?]
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:22:48 +1100
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3E04D993.5168868C@mfi.net> <3E04F868.892F5BF5@yahoo.com> <3E053E5B.FCF38347@mfi.net> <3E055C17.8D64114C@mfi.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-203-51-41-2.nsw.bigpond.net.au (184.108.40.206)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Richard Henry wrote in message
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Richard Henry wrote
>>> Ignorance is inexcusable in the face of google.
>> We'll see...
>>> Form http://pe.usps.gov/cpim/ftp/manuals/dmm/D041.pdf
>>> With respect to "Customer Mail Receptacles"
>>> "...may be used only for matter bearing postage...no part of a mail
>>> receptacle may be used to deliver any matter not bearing postage..."
>> Nothing like his original claim that thats mandated by federal
>> legislation. Clearly the vast bulk of the rest of that aint been
>> mandated by legislation, particularly on the size stuff.
>> Bet you cant actually cite the legislation
>> that says anything like his original claim.
> It appears Spehro has already answered you in a related sub-thread.
Nope, what he waved around doesnt qualify, fails the 'with
intent to avoid payment of lawful postage thereon' test.
> I will repeat here in the interests of thoroughness
> and in continuing opposition to ignorance:
Even you should be able to bullshit your way out
of your predicament better than that pathetic effort.
> By the way, I first learned this when I delivered newspapers many
> years ago. One of the rules was "Never put the paper in a mailbox."
Thats just because of the USPS requirement on that, NOT 'federal law'
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup