From: "Richard Henry"
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3E04D993.5168868C@mfi.net> <3E04F868.892F5BF5@yahoo.com> <3E053E5B.FCF38347@mfi.net> <3E05CC22.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Mail Box
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 03:31:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 22:31:28 EST
Organization: Cox Communications
"Jim Thompson" wrote in message
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 22:26:43 GMT,
> Spehro Pefhany ,
> In Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design,
> Article: ,
> Entitled: "Re: Mail Box",
> Wrote the following:
> |On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:15:24 +1100, the renowned "Rod Speed"
> | wrote:
> |>Or you have no intention of mailing it at all and just want somewhere
> |>reasonably secure to leave it so it doesnt blow away etc. Doesnt
> |>qualify as 'with intent to avoid payment of lawful postage thereon'
> |Can you cite relevant case law that supports that interpretation?
> |Best regards,
> |Spehro Pefhany
> Give it up, Spehro, the guy's a jerk or worse.
> It's always bugged me that you have to buy a mail box, but the USPS
> *owns* it, but them's the facts m'am ;-)
> "Rod Speed" should go out and put fliers in his neighbor's mail boxes
> A postman will eventually notice and "Rod Speed" will be "Rod Stopped"
> by a visit from the USPS Inspector's Office ;-)
It appears that rod may live in Australia, in which case he would face a
different regulatory situation.