The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Rod Speed"
Subject: Re: Mail Box
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:55:22 +1100
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3E04D993.5168868C@mfi.net> <3E04F868.892F5BF5@yahoo.com> <3E053E5B.FCF38347@mfi.net> <3E05CC22.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <1ftN9.firstname.lastname@example.org> <4vvN9.email@example.com> <_AwN9.firstname.lastname@example.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-203-51-41-2.nsw.bigpond.net.au (18.104.22.168)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Some stupid pig ignorant insular yank that couldnt even
bullshit its way out of a wet paperbag even if its pathetic
excuse for a 'life' depended on it, claiming to be
Richard Henry wrote in message
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Richard Henry wrote
>> Cite the federal law, pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist.
> Which law?
Any federal law that has anything to say about
putting a snake in a mailbox will do for a start.
> How any tinmes?
You wont even be able to manage once.
> In response to your disbelief about restrictions on the use
> of "customer mail receptacles" (the ->LEGAL<- term),
Pity those 'restrictions' aint gotta damned thing to do with what
was originally claimed to be contrary TO FEDERAL LAW.
> myself and others have cited,
Not a single one has actually been FEDERAL LAW that does
other than restrict the use of the mailbox 'WITH INTENT TO
AVOID PAYMENT OF LAWFUL POSTAGE' which even
someone as stupid as you should be able to grasp aint
gotta damned thing to do with putting a snake in a mailbox
when it aint even legal to mail a fucking snake at all.
> and partially quoted, relevant USPS regulations
Pity I rubbed your silly little noses in the FACT that the original
claim that there was any US FEDERAL LEGISATION that says
you cant put a snake in a mailbox is just plain wrong.
> and US Code sections.
Just one section which doesnt have a damned thing to do with putting
a snake in a mailbox when it aint even legal to mail a fucking snake at all.
> You have denied their applicability to whatever your position was.
You know what my position is, you pathetic excuse for a bullshit artist.
> So, who's the artist?
You, in spades with this pathetic excuse for bullshit.
>> You cant. It doesnt exist.
> See above.
> By the way, it's "can't", and "doesn't".
Wrong. As always. And even you should be able to bullshit your way
out of your predicament MUCH better than that pathetic effort, Henry.
> When you are quibbling about your opinion of other people's meanings,
More of your pathological lying. That fool Merrill made a VERY
spectacular fool of itself, as always, claiming that FEDERAL
LAW had anything to say about putting a snake in a mailbox.
All the rest of your puerile shit flushed where it belongs.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup