The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "John Jardine"
Subject: Re: LED flickering problem
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:03:30 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Dec 2002 16:50:25 GMT
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
Spehro Pefhany wrote in message
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 14:33:19 -0000, the renowned "John Jardine"
> >Unless you have an incredibly high visual response speed, then a refresh
> >rate of even 20Hz would be sufficient.
> NO.. 20Hz is WAY too slow. Try it (with a numeric display) and see.
> But 80Hz is acceptably fast, with double that being pretty darn good.
> >Sounds like the LEDs when in the 'on state, are not being given enough
> >current to produce the intense, short, bright, flash needed to give the
> >human eye a perception of continuity.
> Drive current doesn't matter other than to establish brightness level,
> there is no effect that is as you describe. The only flicker effect in
> the human eye that I'm aware of is the better perception of flicker
> in the periperal vision. Not a factor here.
> >I.e. As you say, when static, the current is as it should be. But ...
> >being scanned, the current needs to be a lot higher to give more light
> >to balance the shorter time they are 'on'. Essentially the current needed
> >high enough to burn out the LEDs in the static unscanned condition.
> It shouldn't be that high with conservative design practices- under
> typical room-temperature conditions.
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany
> "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
> firstname.lastname@example.org Info for manufacturers:
> Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers:
Yes, 20Hz is *very* slow but look at the early calculators where they used
every trick in the book to get the power consumption down. A lot of them
visibly flickered even when viewed straight on and these operated in the
20Hz area. The interupt servicing is a good idea but what drove me was
"I am sure this is not insufficient current problem coz if it is static, the
LEDs are fine".
I would have expected him to mention a very high static brightness as if it
was a problem but he didn't, which is why I pointed up the 'burn out'
I reckon Timptt is seeing "normal" brighness under static conditions.
Hopefully he may report back with his solution but from past observation I'd
say we're all plaiting fog ;-)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup