The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Subject: Re: Making a fast scope probe
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 16:07:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 16:07:28 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
I have posted a drawing in
of a scope probe attachment method that helps reduce ringing.
The posting subject is "CURLY Qs".
> When I connect a 250MHz scope probe on X10 to the inbuilt 1ns rise time
> square wave in my oscilloscope with the ground lead floating, there is
> ringing on the edges. This is down to the inductance of the loop formed by
> the inner conductor of the probe and the ground of the scope resonating
> the input capacitance of the scope. Connecting the ground of the probe to
> the scope ground via it's BNC eliminates post of the ringing. The loop is
> much smaller since the outer conductor of the probe now transfers most of
> the ground signal.
> On the advice of a link that was posted here a few months back on how to
> construct a "wide-band" probe to 1Ghz consisting of a 100R resistor on the
> inner conductor of co-ax at the sensing end terminated in in it's
> characteristic impedance I noted the following:-
> 1. With the outer conductor only connected at the BNC, there should be
> ringing but there wasn't. The rise time was poor
> 2. Connecting the outer conductor at the sensing end to the BNC slightly
> improved the rise time
> 3. Removing the 50R characteristic impedance made the rise time
> significantly worse with still no ringing seen.
> My conclusion is that without the terminating resistance, you've merely
> a bog-standard x1 probe that is limited by it's ability to charge the
> capacitance of the scope. The terminating impedance improves things only
> because it dominates the input capaciance at the expense of less signal at
> the input. Reducing it to 10R improves the rise time further.
> So what is a better solution? How about splitting the terminating
> as 49R in series with 1R across the input capacitance? I'll try this after
> the new year in the hope of seeing ringing.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup