The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Jim Yanik
Subject: Re: heat seeking missile guidance system
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Friends of Lummox
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 21:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
> Jim Yanik wrote:
>> "Anthony Q. Bachler" wrote in
>>> Imaging is necessary for newer missles that have to hit targets
>>> while moving at supersonic speeds. Older slow missiles from WW2 had
>>> a larger margin of error in the servos and were also less accurate.
>>> Imaging gives the ability to more accurately control the servos
>>> instead of just turning full right/left/up/down.
>> No,imaging is necessary for counter-countermeasures(decoy/flare-
>> rejection).It makes the missile very difficult to jam.But imaging
>> requires more complex computer (FAST)image processing,the servos are
>> probably the same as have been proven in the past.
> Then again, computers are cheap.
> I can't get over the fact that I can produce decent real-time encoded
> video with bits that cost only $100 or so.
Yes,but can you integrate them into a small missile? and can you do the SW
for the job?
Jim Yanik,NRA member
remove X to contact me
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup