The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Rod Speed"
Subject: Re: US Mailboxes
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 08:04:07 +1100
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3E04D993.5168868C@mfi.net> <3E04F868.892F5BF5@yahoo.com> <3E053259.4BEE4229@mfi.net> <email@example.com> <3E0A94DE.firstname.lastname@example.org> <3E0AA17D.E21DED56@mfi.net> <3E0B65C7.email@example.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-203-51-41-2.nsw.bigpond.net.au (126.96.36.199)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
"Fred Bloggs" wrote in message news:3E0B65C7.firstname.lastname@example.org...
> Michael A. Terrell wrote:
> > Fred Bloggs wrote:
> >>William Meyer wrote:
> >>>Michael Painter wrote:
> >>>>A civil action could probably be brought in such a case but it does not fit
> >>>>the definition of assualt (essentially the threat) or battery (the actula
> >>>>action) here in the US.
> >>>No, but I would not be shocked to see a lawyer claim it as an attractive nuisance.
> >>LOL- that would only apply to the owner's liability to the juvenile who
> >>broke his arm while swinging the bat at the box from a vehicle traveling
> >>at 60MPH...possible.
> > The mailbox I was talking about was off the main road, on a private
> > road was properly marked "No Trespassing!", and "No trucks over 6000 lbs
> > GVW". There was no way to drive by it at any speed. You had to pull off
> > the main road, back around, then pull up to it on the right side of the
> > private road and 25 feet off the main road. So you had to trespass on a
> > private road to destroy government property. In an area with numerous
> > complaints filed with the county sheriff over vandalism. You wouldn't
> > have a leg to stand on and not much of an arm to lean on, either. :)
> The detail you are missing is *juvenile*- unless special provisions
> are made in the law- juveniles cannot commit crimes- that is, if you
> are a juvenile, you cannot commit any act that qualifies as a crime.
> This general principle has been amended in recent years to change
> this in very serious cases like murder, carjacking, arson etc where
> under law the juvenile loses this privilege and is tried as an adult.
More utter mangling. Thats just trying the juvenile as an adult, an
entirely separate question to whether a juvenile can commit a crime.
> But unless the law specifically states this, the
> juvenile act cannot be classified as a crime.
Wrong. As always.
> The relatively petty vandalism of smashing a
> mailbox will not be a formal crime for a juvenile.
Wrong. As always.
You're massively confusing the legal situation with juveniles
considered to be too young to have grasped the concepts of
criminal acts, with juveniles who are only a year or two below
what is legally an adult, to commit and be tried for crimes.
> The story for an adult is an entirely different matter- usually he/she
> has no standing to sue for an injury sustained while committing a crime-
> but even this has exceptions. I am sure everyone recalls the famous case
> from the 70's where a burglar did successfully sue an Iowa farmer who
> rigged up a shot-gun boobytrap to kill intruders. The burglar ended up
> with property rights to the farm:-)
Nothing like the situation being discussed.
> That type of thing is still considered going too far these days.
> The steel post sunk in 24" of concrete comes close
Complete and utter drivel. Making a mailbox extra
solid is NOTHING like a shotgun boobytrap you fool.
> but I'm not sure if it's quite there.
Nothing like 'quite there'
> Generally the law does not condone private crime
> prevention that leads to serious injury of the criminal-
Complete and utter drivel with just making whats
being protected from vandalism more solid.
Next you'll be claiming that you cant have
a steel door because some arsehole might
hurt themselves trying to kick it down etc.
> that i s left to law enforcement-)
Wota fucking wanker.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup