From: Chuck Y
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Subject: Re: IR remote control with a computer over long range
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:30:13 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:30:13 GMT
You don't need to modulate the video. Use Coax. For component,
use 3 coaxes of EXACTLY the same length.
You don't WANT to modulate the video if you don't have to.
Google for IR stuff, there are plenty of things that let computers
"See" IR and IR receivers can be run pretty far, wiring wise. CAT
5 is probably overkill, thus safe.
As far as receivers, there are many many receiver chips cheap at
electronics houses (jdr, jameco, digikey, etc, etc). I've seen (and
ignore) projects that can use the IRDa porton the computer to send
to it. Google.
Mark Lloyd wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2002 09:48:41 -0800, firstname.lastname@example.org (Nil Einne) wrote:
> You will need to use shielded cable (coax) or possibly twisted pair
> (CAT5). You could use one coax instead of 3 if you had a modulator at
> the computer (use a good one rather than one of the cheap ch3/4 ones
> they put in VCRs).
>>Or if the just amplify it isn't feasible, any other not too difficult
>>or expensive solutions? I could make a receiver for a serial port or
>>parallel but that will of course be more difficult. I have read that
>>at low baud rates, RS-232 can support lengths of my kind.
>>Thanks for any suggestions and help.
> I don't need to do this, since I have a computer close to my video
> system (not the main computer, but networked to it). If I did, I would
> use the (wired NOT wireless) vedeo extender if I had one or put a
> modulator at the computer and run a coax cable.
> 2 days until the winter solstice celebration
> Mark Lloyd
> "There's no more proof for the existence of God than there is for the existence of the
> Easter Bunny. That's right. The Easter Bunny."