NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 05:40:05 -0600
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (John Fields)
Subject: Re: Combine stereo outputs for twice voltage?
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:19:15 GMT
Organization: Austin Instruments, Inc.
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <6s4P9.10877$jM5.firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:35:44 +1100, "Phil Allison"
>"John Fields" wrote in message
>> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 11:37:33 +1100, "Phil Allison"
>> > ** For Christ's sake John - do I have to always put smileys in for
>> >the Yanks ??
>> > Or write "beware - sarcasm up ahead" ?
>> You really need to do neither.
> ** Oh yes I do.
> Most of us are quite aware of what
>> you're doing, namely, trying to change the direction of the thread
>> so the focus on your error(s) will be lost.
> ** What errors ? - I cannot answer and allusion.
Well, let's just look at the most recent. You wrote, "I cannot
answer and allusion.", which is nonsensical in the context of this
discussion and is, therefore, in error. Perhaps I've missed some
nuance, in which case I'd be ever so grateful if you'd care to clear
it up for me, but if you can't then I expect you to own up to your
error as a gentleman would and admit that you've been unhorsed.
> Case in point, my original post was innocuous and merely a request for
>> from the OP.
> ** Certainly it was.
>> You then took it upon yourself to jump on my post and
>> use it to do a little flaming, hardly a polite thing to do.
> ** I did not "jump on your post".
> I used it to make an *ironic* point about the dickheads here who
>*insist* on answering such questions as the OPs WITHOUT asking the essential
>questions you did.
The fact that you admit that you used my post for your own purposes
attests to the fact that you jumped on it and used it as a vehicle
to further your own ends. Whatever your opinions of the
participants in this discussion might be, be assured that mine are
not likely the same as yours and that your attempt to make it seem
that we (you and I) are, somehow, allied is flawed.
Well, at least as far as this discussion is concerned;-)
I might also point out that while you felt it was important to label
the participants in the discussion who didn't ask "the essential
questions" as "dickheads", neither did you (ask the essential
questions). Ironic, huh?
> ** Yanks are *notorious* for missing sarcasm - and you missed mine.
You must be joking.
Just because we don't always rise to the bait doesn't mean we don't
> Did you imagine for one second I was serious about ......"these
>wonton boys are Gods " ? Have you never read or heard of William
>Golding's "Lord of the Flies" ?
>> I, for one, am wise to your game
> ** Oh come on. That is rediculous, John.
>>and suggest you might have better things to do with your time than to sit
>around licking the burns you'll surely receive if you choose to persist.
> ** This smacks of paranoid delusions.
> It is really very silly.
> .................. Phil
I suggest you get your own mental house in order before you start
Professional circuit designer