The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Da Man"
Subject: Re: Total lack of response re SMT query - What gives ?
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 23:46:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 19:46:20 AST
Your post reminded me of the new SMT IC's avalible - they are the bare die,
with 8 or 9 (in the packages I looked at) BGA balls on the bottom. Now for
the kicker, they are only 500 um (.5 mm) in lenght per side :-( (maybe they
were 800um, I can't remember). The package was called micro BGA. Try hand
"Spehro Pefhany" wrote in message
> On 30 Dec 2002 16:00:50 GMT, the renowned email@example.com
> (Gibbo) wrote:
> >Spehro wrote:
> >>The big discussions (and a lot of problem solving) on SMT were (IIRC)
> >about 15+ years ago in the West and earlier than that in Japan, it's
> >pretty old-hat these days.
> >So how come no-one seems to agree on it ?
> >It clearly isn't that "old hat" !
> In the early stages of any technology, there is typically a lot of
> information sharing, especially when the technology is deemed to be of
> strategic importance over a range of companies that are not
> competitors, as SMT was. There was government-sponsored sharing of
> information. Then it gets into commercialization and there is less of
> it going on. Finally, when it matures you have to poke around dusty
> books, experienced old guys and overweight salesmen to find the
> information you need- there are few trade secrets and few reasons to
> publish the information- learning is on-the-job. SMT is in phase II.
> ;-) Automated thru-hole assembly is in the third phase.
> Back in the days when it was being introduced to North America, it was
> seen as the key to bringing higher levels of automation and higher
> quality to electronics manufacturing, as well as increasing sales by
> making products smaller and therefore less expensive. Very much a case
> of catch-up with the Japanese giants. It's fulfilled much of that
> promise in the consumer electronics industry of course, you can hardly
> imagine a cell phone being made without SMT, but THT hangs in there
> for some things regardless.
> For prototyping and rework- sure there are plenty of ways of doing it,
> and they generally all work well enough. My eyes are such that I don't
> need a Mantis to solder, I just get closer. I have a super little 6x
> Zeiss magnifier for inspection and bright lights.
> When you get into production there are only a few choices of machinery
> and I think just one basic method of soldering (IR Reflow) with the
> death of vapor-phase soldering.
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany
> "it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
> firstname.lastname@example.org Info for manufacturers:
> Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers:
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup