From: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: Can anyone explain the design of tracking systems?
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 12:42:15 +0000
Organization: JMWA Electronics Consultancy
Reply-To: John Woodgate
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:59:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <5Z8C9wtxbnpWyFnyfFzqmVF739>
I read in sci.electronics.design that Anthony Q. Bachler wrote (in ) about 'Can anyone explain the design of
tracking systems?', on Wed, 1 Jan 2003:
>Now if in fact the individual in question had specifically stated
>that he was at such and such a place and made a cell call on said phone, the
>record of the cell call would most likely qualify as hard evidence as the
>individuals whereabouts at the time of the call.
That's what happened. He claimed to be in Rayleigh when he made the
calls in question, but his cell-phone and that of the putative victim
were close together and clearly not in Rayleigh.
>But without habius corpus,
>you cannot get a murder conviction in the states (unless you have a really
>bad lawyer that doesnt even know what habius corpus is).
I don't think you are any too clear on what 'habeas corpus' is, and I
suspect you have confused it with 'corpus delicti'.
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!