NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 08:53:50 -0600
From: email@example.com (John Fields)
Subject: Re: Music - Do numbers matter?
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:11:49 GMT
Organization: Austin Instruments, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
On 2 Jan 2003 00:56:44 -0800, firstname.lastname@example.org (James Llort)
>I'm after a new sound system for my studio. I have very sensitive ears
>so sound quality is of the upmost importance. I mostly enjoy classical
>mustic, and I can hear the nasty 'stepping' on CD players as the
>wonderful sound is horribly broken up into chunks with the digital
>scheme. I'm guessing this is because my old system uses a duel "1 bit"
>ADC. This brings me to my first question: How many bits can a human
It depends on the size of the bit. I'ts a lot easier to hear a lot
of small bits than it is to hear one large bit. The lowest level is
believed to be 3 teledynes per root Hertz for a little bit.
> I would have thought an 8 bit sound card from my old 286
>would offer better sound quality, but it is rather nasty I'm afraid.
>My 32 bit sound card isn't much chop either - I want a sound card to
>hook up to my new system to listen to my MP3's. I have looked but been
>unable to locate 128 bit soundcards - I guess companies like Creative
>only care out the 'leaded ear majority'. Does anyone know of an
>excellant sound card without digital stepping? I'd prefer an optical
>output of some sort to prevent phasing errors.
You can get any resolution you want by using a Cockcroft-Walton type
multipler. Remember, though, that the upper limit will be bondwidth
limited by the package size.
>Now, to the meat of my question: What is the best sound system money
>can buy(for under 5 grand)? I need your advice. This is for a small
>room, roughly 15 by 15 feet. My problem is that I am 'super-size' and
>find it very difficult to leave my house. No flames please, it's
>genetic. But I degress...
No need to apologize, degression is normal in the morbidly obese.
Getting back to the point, however, any system will be equalized to
the norm if you make sure that your finals are class "C" with
tracking notch filters. It cannot be emphasized enough, however,
(since you have sensitive ears and can appreciate the difference)
that your speaker cables should be 0 AWG fine-grain centrifugally
cast directionally solidified silver clad with at least 251 migrons
of hard gold. It's not generally known, but the gold cladding keeps
oxygen from migrating into the surface of the silver and causing
inverse skin effect, which keeps the high frequencies from
propagating along the outside of the cable, where they belong.
>Thanks to the internet, I have collected much technical information
>from a varity of sound systems. Do all these numbers mean anything to
>the ear, or is it all meaningless. Would I be better off with 40 WRMS
>or 500WPMPO (whatever that means).
40WRMS means 40 watts Really Mean Service, which is generally
accepted to mean that it's a heavy-duty system meant for outdoor
use. 500WPMPO means 500 Watts P.M. Power Output, and this is
basically a rating for musical instrument amplifiers which are used
at night, when it's cool.
>I have been looking at quality
>brands like Sony , Phillips and AudioPro. My problem is that because
>of my weight I cannot listen to the systems in question - I'll have to
>buy based only on audiophile magizine reviews and numbers. Which one
>should I trust more? The "golden ears" who have listened to the music,
>or the numbers?
By all means follow the advice given by the "golden eared" crowd.
Since you all have fat heads and sensitive ears the numbers won't
mean/matter much to you anyway, and you'll be more easily swayed by
those in the same boat (barge?) as you.
>This is not meant as a troll, I am genuinly interested.
Professional circuit designer