The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Spehro Pefhany
Subject: Re: best *personal* buys of the year 2002
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:55:10 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:55:10 EST
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 15:35:08 GMT, the renowned firstname.lastname@example.org
>The "Pollutants" being mostly CO, I'm guessing.
Partly burned hydrocarbons, that contribute to air pollution.
There are no catalytic converters on lawn mowers and some lawn
equipment burns oil mixed in with the gasoline.
> IMO, who cares?
I do. The air quality (what stuff I breathe) could be much better.
Downtown looks like there is a brown ooze surrounding it at times.
It actually can kill those who are vulnerable. Other places such
as Chinese cities are much, much worse, of course.
>The main real concern is how much gas was burned.
I disagree. *How well* is the main concern when it comes to
pollutants. A big thermal generating plant has all kinds of controls
and things like scrubbers so that most of what comes out of the stacks
is just steam. None of that can be afforded on a $200 lawn mower.
Only *some* of it can be put on every automobile.
You can even burn nasty stuff like dioxin-laden PCBs (not the
electronic variety) safely and completely with the proper controls
and equipment. A small uncontrolled PCB fire can render an entire
office building unoccupiable just from the soot (happened in
>It takes about 1/4 gallon to mow
>my 1/4 acre lawn. That's enough to drive my car about 6 miles. I drive 300
>miles/week, which completely overwhelms any gas usage from the lawnmower.
>And why would they assume "it's poorly tuned" anyway?
Maybe because few people tune their lawn mowers. A poorly tuned car
produces something like 100 times the pollution of a properly running
car, so the gas consumption means little. That is what is driving the
inspection and certification anti-smog programs in California, Ontario
and elsewhere. But lawn mowers are not subject to such inspection.
Cars are so good now that it's reportedly hard to reliably off
yourself from the CO, you (well, not *you*) might just be left
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
email@example.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup