The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Frank Bemelman"
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Flickering Candlelight Effect??
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 21:10:11 +0100
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Organization: EuroNet Internet
NNTP-Posting-Date: 03 Jan 2003 20:10:57 GMT
"Spehro Pefhany" schreef in bericht
> On 3 Jan 2003 09:39:23 -0800, the renowned firstname.lastname@example.org
> (Aubrey McIntosh) wrote:
> >If you're using a PIC, why not record a real candle flame ((led or
> >photocell) + op amp + a/d) and play it back?
> That crossed my mind, the main objection to it is that there is
> apparent motion and there are color changes in the flame that make
> it appear realistic. No way a single lamp will ever look like a
> candle. I have 3 outputs but used more like 7 or 8 LEDs and a
> theatrical color filter.
My filter for my lamps was white painter's tape.
> Of course you could videotape a real flame and then try to analyze
> that. Frank seems to have the equipment to do that- I'm still missing
> a Firewire port to get the info into my computer.
I have a digital fotocamera that is able to take short
mpeg/avi movies, an option found on practically all
cameras today. This was the first time it served a
(remove 'x' & .invalid when sending email)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup