The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: James Meyer
Subject: Re: Thermal runaway: please settle this dispute!
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <4KfR9.92768$hK4.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 22:17:08 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 17:17:08 UWT
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 14:55:11 +0000, Paul Burridge
>Well you've both identified the source of confusion for a lot of
>people. Many text books use the term "Vbe" at one moment to refer to a
>device's internal Vbe - or *barrier height potential* as it is more
>properly known as - and at other times to refer to *applied* Vbe from
>some external voltage source.
>That is why I was particular in using the term *barrier height* in my
>original post. It's the fall in *barrier height* between emitter and
>base with increased temperature that gives rise to increased current
>flow if the *external Vbe* isn't reduced to compensate for it. Hope
>this clears things up for anyone left who hasn't spotted this
>essential little difference yet.
>Now where did I put the asprins?
Now the ONLY question left to answer is, "How many transistor designs
use a voltage source to bias the B-E junction?"
The overwhelming majority of circuits I look at use CURRENT sources for
B-E junction bias currents. In that case, reduced "barrier height potentials"
play a very small part in thermal runaway problems.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup