The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Michael Culley"
References: <3E160F0D.B23A8BE5@sympatico.ca> <3E165F62.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Defeating Breathalyzer Ignition Interlocks
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:59:23 +1100
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
Maybe, maybe not. Those who drive a little over the limit might drink less,
but I doubt it would affect those who drive significantly over the limit. In
order to drive drunk alot of denial is required, which would result in
excused like "I've been meaning to get one of those" or "I'm a little short
of cash at the moment but I will get one soon" :-)
"Richard Henry" wrote in message
> "Michael Culley" wrote in message
> > The end result of
> > making breath testers widely available would be more people close the
> > bac limit.
> Allow me to propose that the result would be FEWER people OVER the limit.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup