The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Mike Monett
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win16; I)
Subject: Re: Low leakage parts
References: <email@example.com> <3E17D633.378A@sneakemail.com> <3E184B38.588B@sneakemail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3E186B3C.5BA0@sneakemail.com> <email@example.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 13:58:38 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 13:58:06 EST
Organization: Bell Sympatico
Boris Mohar wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:28:28 -0500, Mike Monett
> >Boris Mohar wrote:
> >[... good info]
> >> Regards,
> >> Boris Mohar
> >> Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs
> >Thanks for the excellent info. If you find a sub for the 3N155A please
> >let us know.
> 3N163 from Siliconix. The specify the IGSS leakage of <-1pA at VGS of
> -40V. They were also used in same instrument that measured 1fA and up.
> I would still like to find something better.
> Boris Mohar
> Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs
Do you have to select devices to get low enough leakage?
Have you thought about the LMC662: 2fA typ, 1.3uV/C tempco? This would
raise the minimum current that can be measured, but the drift with
temperature is attractive for long-term meaurements.
How important is the low-fA region anyway? Are there many instances where
being able to measure it directly really matters?
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup