From: John Woodgate
Subject: Re: Defeating Breathalyzer Ignition Interlocks
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 19:50:42 +0000
Organization: JMWA Electronics Consultancy
References: <3E160F0D.B23A8BE5@sympatico.ca> <3E15ED10.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reply-To: John Woodgate
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 21:36:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <5Z8C9wtxbnpWyFnyfFzqmVF739>
I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs
wrote (in <3E18649A.email@example.com>) about 'Defeating Breathalyzer
Ignition Interlocks', on Sun, 5 Jan 2003:
>Since speed is what causes objects to collide, then by definition, the
>occurrence of an accident is always traveling
OK up to there.
> too fast for roadway
>conditions -to include traffic density and other potential hazards.
No, that is a non-sequitur. Accidents *don't necessarily* involve
inappropriate speeds. If they did, the crusaders' statistics would say
that 'In 100% of accidents, excessive speed is involved.' Even they
don't go as far as that.
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!