From: "Da Man"
References: <3E160F0D.B23A8BE5@sympatico.ca> <3E165F62.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <3E1871F7.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Defeating Breathalyzer Ignition Interlocks
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 04:32:14 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 00:32:14 AST
"John Woodgate" wrote in message
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bloggs
> wrote (in <3E1871F7.email@example.com>) about 'Defeating Breathalyzer
> Ignition Interlocks', on Sun, 5 Jan 2003:
> >These are designed to detect ethyl alcohol (2
> >bands), acetone, acetaldehyde and toluene.
> Toluene? Why toluene? It's a widely-used solvent, so people could have
> it on their clothes, etc. and have breathed in the vapour.
People who paint, clean stuff, or otherwise use these solvents can be
completely sober or have 1 beer and push them waaaaayyyyyyy over the limit.
Lawers have gotten people off with this.
> Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
> Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go
> PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!