From: "Frank Bemelman"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: To C or not to C
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 21:29:12 +0100
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Organization: EuroNet Internet
NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Jan 2003 20:29:21 GMT
"Spehro Pefhany" schreef in bericht
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:38:55 +0100, the renowned "Frank Bemelman"
> >But perhaps his compiler was buggy and didn't know how to increment
> >pointers to CODE space. I can vagely recall myself messing around with
> >indexing arrays and not using pointers, when trying to do something
> >in CODE space. CODE and RAM are physically seperated, in case of 8051.
> Yes, well, one might wonder aloud why he isn't just using the library
> strcpy(char *dest, char *src) .. doesn't it work with code memory?
I'm probably talking nonsense. I remembered computing a eprom-checksum
as part of a sanity-check, looked this up, but I'm using pointers
there. Maybe it was something with pointers aimed at longs in CODE
space, I don't know anymore. And, yes, of course, we expect everything
to work as it should ;)
(remove 'x' & .invalid when sending email)