The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
Reply-To: "Kevin Aylward"
From: "Kevin Aylward"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Help analysing a CMOS ring oscillator
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-Inktomi-Trace: public1-pete2-5-cust126.pete.broadband.ntl.com 1042038323 30998 126.96.36.199 (8 Jan 2003 15:05:23 GMT)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 15:05:21 -0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 15:05:24 GMT
Phil Aldis wrote:
> Thanks for your response - unfortunately I don't have time to simulate
> the circuit in SPICE. It's for a lab write-up and would be a bit
> beyond the scope.
> Is the difference in my experimental readings attributable to the
> lumped capicitance on average being bigger. I understand (now) that
> the device capicitance won't be constant but if represented the device
> change with a single 'average' change in C which resulted in the same
> change in gate delay - would this CLoad be an increase and so would
> the gate delay then increase slightly?
An issue here is that in an actual oscillator like this, the delay/phase
shift around the loop could be significantly different from that
calculated from a simple single stage analysis. The load of one stage
may be significant. I would say that the best way to analyse this in
practice, is to use spice, if you actually want to know how the whoule
oscillator is working.
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup