From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Rich Grise)
Subject: Re: Graphics Quality...jpg, png, tiff
Date: 10 Jan 2003 18:48:01 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jan 2003 02:48:02 GMT
Spehro Pefhany wrote in message news:...
> TIFF is probably the best image format if you don't care about image
> size. Avoid JPG, especially for images that are not photos. PNG is
> better if you care about file size, but it's still lossless. JPG is
> lossy. I think if you need CMYK you may have or want to go with TIFF.
> Don't know anything about Paintshop, and I try to avoid BMP images
> wherever possible.
> Best regards,
> Spehro Pefhany
I agree about avoiding BMP files - they're HUGE, expecially when
you import them into a M$ word file. I'm in the process of
plaigarizing some manuals, and one of the things they have
is "Visio," which, as it turns out, is a dream for doing
flowcharts and stuff; anyway, when I update a Visio flowchart,
it gives me a "save as" drop-down box with about a dozen different
formats, one of which is .bmp, and another is .wmf. So, I'm
looking at this chart, and the doc. it's supposed to go in
doesn't read .vsd files, so I export it as a .bmp file. Then
go back to word, insert the picture, and get a 360K document.
So I go back to Visio, save as a .wmf, import the .wmf into the
word doc (replacing the .bmp), and the file is like 16K!
I have some OCR software that will ONLY accept uncompressed
TIFF files (or raw scanner, but that's a pain in the you-know-
what); I haven't compared bmp to tif files as far as size, I've
just usually used whatever works.
My stock answer is use .gif for line art and .jpg for the
nudies. ;-} AIUI, .gif compresses the best, losslessly, albeit
I haven't actually bothered to do any comparisons to compressed
tiff. BMP files are ridiculous, and of course everyone knows
whom we should thank for that piece of work. ;=}
"We have met the enemy, and he is us!"