The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <email@example.com> <0QLT9.20902$jM5.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Acoustic Feedback reduction
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:03:45 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:53:22 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"g0mem" wrote in message
> > >
> > > It would cetainly be noticable with miked up acoustic instruments,
> a piano. People would here the piano itself and the piano +4Hz sharp
> coming out of the PA system, it would sound horrible.
> > ** Bull. You have not tried it and you do not know.
> WRONG! I have tried it here!!!.
** You tried PITCH SHIFTING.
And I know several professional musicians.
** OK - I will not tell anyone - your secret is safe.
> > The sound from the PA ought to be louder than the one from the
> > piano and arrive earlier by many mS. No beats are heard in this case.
> I have been involved in concerts in the past with acoustic instuments, and
> the musicians can here the sound of their own
.......... huh ????
> > > Which has> much less affect on the tonal quality than listening to an
> > instrument that's SHARP or FLAT.
> > ** Stupid remark. The whole performance is shifted. Nothing is
> or> sharp.
> Not stupid. The professionals don't use pitch shifting, they use
> tuned notch filters and graphic EQs for sound reinforcement.
** Completely stupid - you just changed the subject Mr PITA.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup