The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Acoustic Feedback reduction
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:28:54 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:18:18 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Nico Coesel" wrote in message
> "Phil Allison" wrote:
> >"Nico Coesel" wrote in message
> >> I used to work for a company which installed a lot of PA systems in
> >> churches. We either used frequency shifting
> > ** The Polyfusion unit or another ?
> No, a self made one. It works great but it has one disadvantage; the
> designer of the unit thought 16bit/16kHz ought to be enough. I never
> got the time to fix that.
** This is the first I have *ever* heard of a digital algorithm for
frequency shifting - how did you do it ?? What DSP chip did you use ?
Did you not realise is was so much easier to do analogue?
> > ** So the shifter was the best choice ?
** It usually is.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup