The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
Subject: Re: Acoustic Feedback reduction
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:11:54 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:01:19 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Gibbo" wrote in message
> Absolutely *but* if A=440 then its first octave harmonic = 880Hz. If A=441
> (still perfectly acceptable) then its 1st octave harmonic = 882Hz. If we
> shift the whole thing up by 5Hz then A=446 Hz (still fine by my ear) but
> first octave harmonic is now at 887Hz which sounds absolutely shite. This
> effect becomes worse as we get lower down the musical scale. A low E on a
> double bass will be roughtly a full tone sharp yet it's octave harmonic
> a semitone sharp. Despite Mr Wombat's assertions to the contrary. He's
> obviously not a musician (or just a very bad one).
** You are way of topic with hypotheticals.
The ONLY test is with a REAL shifter and recorded music.
There are no disturbing effects heard.
Of course, if you are tuning an electric guitar do not use a shifter in
line with the amp, the task becomes never ending.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup