The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Tom Bruhns)
Subject: Re: jellybean audio transistors
Date: 14 Jan 2003 14:58:12 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jan 2003 22:58:12 GMT
"Walter Harley" wrote in message news:...
> I need a complementary pair of transistors for a low-power push-pull emitter
> follower stage, operating at audio frequencies. Specs I need are Ic(peak)
> >300mA; Vceo >30v; hfe ~ 100 at Ic = 30mA or so; Pd low enough that a TO92
> case is acceptable (though not quite ideal). I'm currently using 2n2222 and
> 2n2907, mostly because that's what I "imprinted" on in the 1980's. Glancing
> at some spec sheets, I noticed that 2n4401/2n4403 have very similar specs,
> and identical prices.
> My question is threefold:
> 1) With specific respect to these two pairs (2n2222/2n2907 and
> 2n4401/2n4403), is there some meaningful difference that I'm missing? They
> seem so similar that I'm not sure why they bother manufacturing both kinds.
The 4401/4403 have a bit better holdup of hFE at high current, and a
bit worse flatness of hFE at lower current.
> 2) There's a zillion general-purpose complementary NPN/PNP pairs out there,
> too many to study all the datasheets. Maybe the technology has improved
> over the last 20 years? Should I be looking to adopt a new set of audio
> jellybeans? If so, can someone help me narrow the search by tipping me off
> to what the good lines are these days?
I think the 4401/4403, 2222/2907 and 5089 (or 5210)/5087 are all still
good choices for medium-to-low current audio work. There are also
some good 2S and BC numbers, but the 2N numbers are most readily
available to me so I use them. The fact that all are readily
available in SMT tells me that they are still all used in reasonably
> 3) For this relatively non-critical application, does it even matter?
> Should I just stick with what I've got?
I'd stay with them if they work for you. If low noise or low
distortion are particularly important, you might be able to do better,
but you likely should also look very carefully at other factors like
circuit topology and selection of passive components and layout.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup