The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
References: <3FsT9.19037$oS1.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <6P2U9.21562$jM5.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <6Ecb3QBBoGJ+Ewvc@jmwa.demon.co.uk> <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Mosfet amp desigh sought
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:30:38 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:19:57 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"John Woodgate" wrote in message
> I read in sci.electronics.design that Phil Allison
> wrote (in ) about 'Mosfet
> amp desigh sought', on Thu, 16 Jan 2003:
> > Kindly explain by how much and how a person must be "preconditioned
> >" in order to achieve this feat and how quiet the environment must be
> Well, if you want to argue with Fletcher and Munson, or Robinson and
> Dadson, feel free. In that respect, I'm just the messenger.
** How pompous. Please post the alleged "messgage" instead of being so
anal about it.
> If you want to include the ambient noise, then your '0 dB SPL' is
** No it is not. There is always some ambient noise and the threshold
is not even 0dB SPL but a higher figure in normal circumstances.
You would need to say 'x dB below the ambient noise level'
** For what John ? Being pithy is cute but often ambiguous too.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup