The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
Subject: Re: Acoustic Feedback reduction
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:55:17 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:44:18 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Gibbo" wrote in message
** NOTE: Mr Gibbon fails again to respond to any of my valid points or
> Ok Mr Wombat now you've started to be sensible and stop your abuse hurling
> answer you.
** Would you like to stop posting nonsence and calling it fact ???
> Most types of music involve an awful lot of power in the lower octaves.
> includes rock music to a certain extent and particularly orchestral music
> muscal show productions. These types of music are completely unsuitable
> via 5Hz frequency shifter. I have shown that with the wav file I posted.
> What I would like you to explain is why a *pitch* shifter does not work
> feedback reduction.
** See my earlier posts in this thread like the one to Mr Pearce on the
13th - it is all there.
I *know* it doesn't work because I've tried it at live
> venues. I also know that a 5Hz shift doesn't work because any decent
> simply will not tolerate it any where near his instrument.
** That is stupid.
Musicians should NOT be in a postition to hear the shifted version and
those that made a recording are not involded at all.
BTW I have used a shifter for vocal foldback in loud bands with no
problems - the singer can only hear the shifted voice and the slight pitch
rise can compensate for a tendencey to sing flat ( as heard by the audience)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup