The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: Paul Burridge
Subject: Re: Transistor amplifiers v. frequency in SPICE
References: <3E20D1C8.166C@sneakemail.com> <email@example.com> <3E219D46.6F0A@sneakemail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <3E234744.email@example.com> <3E244BDD.41FF@sneakemail.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:44:23 +0000
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:41:57 GMT
Organization: Virgin Net Usenet Service
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 01:41:34 GMT, James Meyer
> It looks suspicious. The SIN statement has six parameters. Only the
>last three can be safely omitted. You've only got two parameters showing.
>Stick a dummy 10K in just after the 0.02 and leave some whitespace between the
>10K and the following ).
I'm grateful for your input, James and I don't want to argue the toss
with you over something I know so little about, but here's the same
line from a different circuit I built up - the RF class C stage I
mentioned elsewhere in the thread a few minutes earlier today:
Vsource 37 27 DC 0 SIN( 0 1.2) AC 1.5
This works absolutely fine and yet still has only 2 parameters, just
the same as the simulation that doesn't work. I can't see how the lack
of parameters can account for the problem. OTOH, could it be that with
AC sweep, the missing parameters are inserted only at run-time by the
sweep function itself?
"What is now proved was once only imagin'd"
- William Blake, 1793
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup