The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Phil Allison"
Subject: Re: How to Cheat in Debates
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:27:37 +1100
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:16:27 EST
Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
"Bill Sloman" wrote in message
> This is 5a in all its glory. If Brian Moore isn't a recognised
> independent authority,
** On what ?? And why is he right and everybody else wrong ??
> The requirement that they have written a specific answer to your
> particular question that even you find non-ambiguous is of course,
> another variant of 5a.
** More insults pretending to be points.
> > ** That is a piece of public entertainment - not a search for the
> Public debates are public entertainment - you have to entertain your
> public before you can get them to listen to your version of the truth.
** Stupid shit - Bill can you do no better than this ????
> > ** See above Bill. BTW You must post the wording of the info you
> > quoting.
> Certainly not. It is a total waste of bandwidth, and opens the way to
> editing the information to "emphasise" the point that you want to
> make. If you are too lazy to go to a web site, then you are too lazy
> to take a useful part in a debate.
** You did not even explain how the URL backed up what .
You simply used it as a hand grenade.
> > ** Number 10 Bill - you have no case to post so you post insults.
> I'm not "debating" with you, Phil - I'm using you as a horrible
> example of things you are complaining about. This is just one extended
> ironic joke, with you as the butt. I must say that describing someone
> as Beatified is about as far from what is normally understood by an
> insult as you can get.
** Bill - you have no case and you keep insulting me - Why?
Are you mentally ill ? The illusion if same is perfect.
> Calling an Australian citizen an "arrogant Dutchman" is merely an
> inexactitude, or perhaps an ignorant stupidity, so perhaps you aren't
> tarred with the same brush.
** What you really are is indescribable and very evil.
The Nazis would have adopted you in a flash.
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup