The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroup
This Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To This Or Any Other
Newsgroup. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroup And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: "Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund"
References: <email@example.com> <3E27B2AA.3F7C851C@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour - core saturation puzzle
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:07:00 +0100
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
Organization: TDC Internet
"Robert Baer" wrote in message
> Klaus Kragelund wrote:
> > I've been doing some common-mode coil saturation tests:
> > One side of the coil is shorted and on the other side a DC voltage is
> > applied. The current ramps linear up until the core saturates at which
> > point the coil di/dt will rise significantly due to the reduced
> > permeability. Taking the data from the scope - doing some number
> > crunshing will allow me to plot the inductance as a function of the
> > coil current.
> > My problem is that the test is done perhaps once a second and the
> > saturation current reaches some level - lets say 10amps. But if I
> > increase the frequency of the test - the saturation level moves down
> > to perhaps 8 amps. Does anyone have an explanation for this?
> > I've allready checked the current when the ramp starts - and it is
> > zero - so there is no energy stored in advance. Moreover I have a
> > flyback diode accross the coil to absorbe the flyback voltage.
> > Perhaps some flux imbalance from the hystersis curve?
> > Thanks
> > Klaus
> There are a few "minor" problems:
> 1) If you truly have DC on one winding, the state of the other winding
> is not relevant ("shorted").
The DC is switched in at each cycle - to let the current rise at a rate
depending upon the inductance at that instance. If the other coil was not
shorted - the inductance would be hundreds of times larger
> 2) You state current ramps up; therefore neither the voltage nor the
> current is constant; ie: *no* C.
Hmm - I don't know what you mean by that. For a coil: dI/dt = V/L. So if
the voltage is DC and the coil is perfect the ramp will be perfectly linear
> 3) You are using a transformer with a shorted secondary.
Yes - se the my other post - that explains why
> 4) There is a fair amount of leakage inductance as well as inter-winding
Yes - exactly - thats what I measuring :-)
> 5) Losses in any transformer core tend to increase as frequency
Also - se the other post
> 6) Just because the current you see as being zero, does not mean there
> is no energy stored somewhere.
The current probe is in series with the coil (coil energy is ½ x L x V^2)
And the duty-cycle is very low - so parasitics should not have anything to
say - but I'll check that current again to make sure it is indeed zero
> 7) A flyback diode will not and cannot absorb all of the energy, and
> certainly does *not* "absorb" voltage!
Absorbe voltage is a bad expression - but it should be able to dissipate all
> In fact, the diode will help the current continue thru the transformer
> winding, building up a magnetic field opposite to the original
> "charging" field.
> You most likely will see a partly damped "oscillation" if the duty
> cycle is low.
> 8) That shorted winding will reflect a rather low impedance (a short if
> the transformer were perfect).
> You are probably driving the leakage inductance of the transformer.
Yes - what I aimed for :-)
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The sci.electronics.design Newsgroup