From: Don Pearce
Subject: Re: A new toaster design? Is it worth it?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:48:32 +0000
References: <3E25A628.D89106AE@sbcglobal.net> <_FlV9.2170$yT2.email@example.com> <3E29E874.3B8E642B@webaccess.net> <1ECW9.25063$Ji6.firstname.lastname@example.org> <+oWacOAk76K+EwVN@jmwa.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host213-120-107-202.in-addr.btopenworld.com (220.127.116.11)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 08:10:12 +0000, John Woodgate
>I read in sci.electronics.design that Ed Price wrote
>(in ) about 'A new toaster
>design? Is it worth it?', on Mon, 20 Jan 2003:
>>(Those who could not speak were assumed to be too stupid to speak, hence
>The two words are from different recent origins, and 'dumb' in the sense
>of 'stupid' didn't exist in British English until recently, and still
>isn't widely used. That sense of 'dumb' is a borrowing of 'dumm' =
>'stupid' from German (or 'dom' from Dutch) into US English in the 19th
>century. The British English word 'dumb' = mute came, much earlier, from
>the same root as the German 'Stumm' and Dutch 'stom'.
If we are into the etymology of insults - did you know that imbecile
comes from imbaculum - Latin for "no stick", meaning unable to walk
without a stick.
In US English, this would probably translate as unable to walk and
chew gum. Now who was that...?