The Cyber-Spy.Com Usenet Archive Feeds Directly
From The Open And Publicly Available Newsgroups
These Group And Thousands Of Others Are Available
On Most IS NNTP News Servers On Port 119.
Cyber-Spy.Com Is NOT Responsible For Any Topic,
Opinions Or Content Posted To These Or Any Other
Newsgroups. This Web Archive Of The Newsgroups And
Posts Are For Informational Purposes Only.
From: K Stahl
Organization: Unnamed Superiors
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U)
Subject: Re: STILL No Arabs on Flight 77
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 03:50:16 GMT
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 03:50:16 GMT
Arther Miller wrote:
> STILL No Arabs on Flight 77
> Thomas R. Olmsted, M.D.
> I am an ex Naval line officer and a psychiatrist in private practice in New
> Orleans, a Christian and home school dad. It troubled me that we rushed to
> war on the flimsiest of evidence. I considered various ways to provide a
> smoking gun as to who perpetrated Sept 11th.
> Astute observers noticed right away that there were no Arabic-sounding names
> on any of the flight manifests of the planes that "crashed" Sept 11. A list
> of names on a piece of paper is not evidence, but an autopsy by a
> pathologist is.
> I undertook by FOIA request, to obtain that autopsy list of the people on
> Flight 77, which hit the Pentagon. You are invited to view it below. Guess
> what? Still no Arabs on the list. In my opinion, the monsters who planned
> this crime made a mistake by not including Arabic names on the original list
> to make the ruse seem more believable.
> When airline disasters occur, airlines will routinely provide a manifest
> list for anxious families. You may have noticed that even before Sep 11th,
> airlines were pretty meticulous about getting an accurate headcount before
> takeoff. It seems very unlikely to me that FIVE Arabs sneaked onto a flight
> with weapons.
> This is the list provided by American of the 56 passengers:
> On September 27th, the FBI published photos of the "hijackers" of Flight 77:
> Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology
> (AFIP), does a miraculous job and identified nearly all the bodies on
> November 16th 2001.
> The AFIP suggests these numbers:189 killed, 125 worked at the Pentagon and 64
> were "passengers" on the plane. The AA list only had 56 and the list just
> obtained has 58. They did not explain how they were able to tell "victims"
> bodies from "hijacker" bodies. In fact, from the beginning NO explanation
> has been given for the extra five suggested in news reports except that the
> FBI showed us the pictures to make up the difference, and that makes it so.
> Now, being the trusting sort, I figured that the government would want to
> quickly dispel any rumors so we could get on with the chore of kicking
> Osama/Saddam's butt (weren't these originally two different people?). It
> seemed simple to me. . .produce the names of all the bodies identified by
> the AFIP and compare it with the publicized list of passengers. So, I sent a
> FOIA request to the AFIP and asked for an expedited response. Fourteen
> months later, a few US soldiers dead, many Iraqi civilians pushing up
> daisies, and I finally get the list. Believe me that they weren't a bit
> happy to give it up, and I really have no idea why they choose now to
> release it.
> No Arabs wound up on the morgue slab. However, three ADDITIONAL people not
> listed by American Airline sneaked in. I have seen no explanation for these
> extras. I did give American the opportunity to "revise" their original list,
> but they have not responded.
> The new names are: Robert Ploger, Zandra Ploger, and Sandra Teague. The AFIP
> claims that the only "passenger" body that they were not able to identify is
> the toddler, Dana Falkenberg, whose parents and young sister are on the list
> of those identified.
> The satanic masterminds behind this caper may be feeling pretty smug about
> the perfect crime, but they have left a raft of clues tying these
> unfortunates together. Stay tuned for part two for a much closer look of the
> cast of characters on this ill-fated flight.
> Autopsy List Flight 77 (below)
> boothmary jane
Your credibility shot down to zero the moment you listed the rense
website. If you accept the contents of that web site as reliable it
doesn't matter what degrees you have or what your military rank was
(after all, you were an officer and that means you never did any real
work as opposed to enlisted men who are the ones that actually keep the
Navy running). You can also forget about your religion impressing me
either - christians are amongst the most dishonest religious people in
the world and if they have to say that they are a christian it means
they don't live by it very well so other people have to be given a clue.
Your "evidence" is flimsy and superficial. You don't know what you are
Go Back To The Cyber-Spy.Com
Usenet Web Archive Index Of
The alt.politics.org.fbi Newsgroup